In a comment on the previous post about the AP and media neutrality, Harry Shearer makes an excellent point – that, in addition to the Iraq war runup and political coverage, the media also failed in its post-Katrina coverage:

Framing it as a natural disaster–as opposed to the ‘greatest engineering disaster since Chernobyl’–and further framing it as a basically black tragedy (because the black people in the Dome and Convention Center were easier to reach and tape than the white people stranded on their roofs in St. Bernard Parish–was compounded by media folks patting themselves on the back for their “ballsy’ coverage.

I agree. New Orleans’ post-Katrina trajectory could have been a lot different had the media taken a more aggressive role in reporting what actually happened (a civic/government failure to secure citizens’ safety) as opposed to the misleading shorthand version of it that emerged in the immediate aftermath of the storm (heckuva job, Brownie).

But I’d draw a distinction between the media treatment of post-Katrina New Orleans and the two other examples. Pre-Iraq reporting and campaign coverage are both examples of the successful co-optation and/or exploitation of the mainstream media’s “neutrality” by the Bush-Rove political project. That project turned out to be not just misleading, but substantively disastrous. So the media have deservedly lost credibility along with Bush. And, like Bush, many media outlets won’t acknowledge anything was or is amiss. You can’t be “neutral” if you’re living in a fantasy.

The failure to protect New Orleans is both more profound and literally more dangerous than the Iraq misadventure or the rise of Drudge-style politics. More profound because it was a breakdown at all levels of government that led to the levee failures, and those institutional problems haven’t been fixed. More dangerous because it killed a lot of people, and because more will likely die in the future – in New Orleans and elsewhere – as sea levels rise and storms likely grow more intense. But the media failure to “get” this isn’t so much an failure of neutrality undermined by ideology (though there is an element of that) as it is just general media stupidity and short-sightedness, reflecting American society’s stupidity and short-sightedness. Which is sad, and scary. But maybe some new political leadership can begin to address that problem.

There’s a question I’d like to know the answer to. Hurricane Gustav dealt New Orleans a glancing blow, passing it by on northwest course. Yet as the world saw yesterday, the city’s Industrial Canal – the large waterway that runs north-south – filled nearly to the top, and there was some alarming if mostly harmless overtopping due to wind and waves. Why did this happen, and what does it say about the city’s vulnerabilities in future storms?

I sort-of know the answer to this. The Industrial Canal is connects to both the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway and the notorious Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet, or MRGO. The latter is slated for closure because of its role in coastal erosion and (though this is controversial) as a conduit for storm surges into the city. Both these waterways run adjacent to open marshes that are rapidly eroding, and Lake Borgne, which is essentially a large lagoon open to the Gulf. So it’s very easy for a lot of water to get into the heart of New Orleans. It happened in Katrina. Now it has happened in Gustav. The Corps of Engineers plans to build a gate across both waterways where they meet in a giant “V.” That area also became notorious after Katrina because storm surge water flowing into the vertex of the V can rise up very high and overtop levees. And from that point, it’s a straight shot to the Industrial Canal, alongside neighborhoods of the St. Bernard, the Lower 9th Ward and eastern New Orleans.

But if the large flow into the Industrial Canal, and its near overtopping Monday, is due partly to the diminished protection of disappearing marshes, this whole area may be getting even more dangerous. Building a gate may offer a good solution, but it also seems we’re getting closer to a New Orleans-as-Venice scenario, in which Gulf waters are lapping against levees, gates and other structures – a risky scenario indeed.

A levee in Plaquemines Parish has apparently been overtopped and may be in danger of breaching. This is obviously a serious problem, but to put things in perspective, the affected area, Braithwaite, is quite small, and outside the federal hurricane levee system. Plaquemines runs from east of New Orleans down to the end of the river. As in most of the parish, there’s Mississippi River levee on one side, a road/homes, and then a “back levee” abutting the marshes. It’s this back levee that’s endangered by floodwaters coming from the south and east. Those waters ought to be subsiding now, so the danger may abate.

Interestingly, Braithwaite abuts the Caernarvon Fresh Water Diversion Project, a gate in the Mississippi River that’s opened at strategic times during the year to send river water over the marshes, depositing silt and slowing the progress of coastal erosion. Now the Corps plans to open the gates and allow floodwaters to flow in the opposite direction – into the river instead of out – in order to ease the pressure on the affected levee.

The site is also notorious: during the 1927 Mississippi River flood, Louisiana officials dynamited the river levee at Caernarvon, flooding Plaquemines and St. Bernard Parishes in order to save New Orleans. Residents were promised restitution, but got almost nothing afterward. And blowing up the levee turned out to be pointless – thanks to levee breaks upstream, New Orleans would not have flooded. This is one source of the persistent rumors about dynamiting levees that resurfaced during Katrina.

Update: MSNBC is reporting that opening the Caernarvon gates worked; the water level has dropped and the levee is intact.

Not good: water has begun to overtop floodwalls in the New Orleans Industrial Canal. This is happening in the Upper 9th Ward – i.e., on the other side of the canal from the Lower 9th. As the picture and the name of the canal indicate, this is an industrial area of town. The floodwalls in question have been fortified post-Katrina. Corps officials are saying that this is not true overtopping – i.e., it’s mainly waves being pushed over by wind.

However, indications are the water is still rising. In Shell Beach, which lies to the east, water levels have reached 10 feet:

The Industrial Canal connects both to Lake Pontchartrain and to the eastern marshes where Shell Beach is, so the water level has the potential to keep rising as the storm moves through. Also, once water starts coming over the top of a levee or floodwall, its capacities are obviously exceeded; structural problems begin to mount and the risk of a breach increases. Fortunately, these floodwalls are equipped with concrete splashpads on the dry side so that water flowing over them won’t erode the foundations.

Update: Corps officials in Baton Rouge say they believe the wall will hold. Water levels in the canal will likely drop because the water will flow into Lake Pontchartrain, where the water level has not risen appreciably (which is why they have not had to shut the new floodgates on the drainage canals that lead into city neighborhoods). Gustav’s winds have been pushing water into New Orleans from the south and east. But to get into the lake, the Gulf storm surge has to travel both farther north and then a lot farther inland. That would require powerful, sustained easterly winds. That’s why the lake isn’t filling up – Gustav is too far to the west, and moving away. Also, as you can see from the Shell Beach graphic, the water level to the east of New Orleans appears to have topped out at 10 feet. As Gustav moves on, the winds will shift to the west and begin pushing that water back out to sea.

Later update: The water level in the Industrial Canal (AKA the Inner Harbor Navigation Canal – that is the official name, but in NO it’s universally known as the Industrial Canal) is dropping, though the TP reports there is still some wave overtopping occurring.

The forecast continues to incrementally improve for New Orleans. The Corps of Engineers’ latest storm surge projections show a lower risk for New Orleans:

The latest prediction of reduced Hurricane Gustav storm surge should be good news for the Industrial Canal and St. Bernard Parish levees, but may still potentially put water over deficient levees on the west bank of Jefferson Parish, the Army Corps of Engineers’ ranking officer said Sunday.

Lt. Gen. Robert Van Antwerp, the corps’ chief of engineers, also suggested that only one of three New Orleans outfall canals still have to be closed against the surge.

St. Bernard Parish lies to the east of New Orleans and would bear the initial brunt of storm surge flooding driven by Gustav’s counterclockwise winds. The Industrial Canal bisects the city, running north-to-south. It breached in several spots during Katrina and repairs and restoration are ongoing. Officials were worried that high water could find remaining weak points, posing danger to adjacent neighborhoods. It also appears that the storm surge heights along the south shore of Lake Pontchartrain won’t be that severe, which is why they may not have to close all three canal floodgates.

There’s a much larger risk to the sprawling west bank suburbs. The storm will pass much closer to them, driving floodwaters into Barataria Bay and northward into communities. The levee system down there is an incomplete patchwork.

Update: Apparently the state’s modeling shows the risk for the west bank suburbs also declining.

Gov. Bobby Jindal said storm surge modeling indicated water levels could be much lower on the West Bank than the weather service announcement predicted, and surge would not be likely to overtop levees in Jefferson Parish.

Fingers crossed that these trends continue.

Hurricane Gustav weakened somewhat overnight, but is expected to strengthen rapidly again – thanks to the warm waters of the Gulf’s loop current – before striking the coastline midday Monday. Meanwhile, the forecast track again shifted incrementally eastward. Each increment increases the likelihood of hurricane-force winds and levee-topping storm surges in the New Orleans area, especially in suburbs on the west bank of the Mississippi River (i.e., south of the city proper) which abut marshes and where the levee system is incomplete. This is bad.

Hurricane Gustav strengthened very rapidly today into a Category 4 storm, and forecasters believe it may reach Category 5 for a time Sunday, then weaken before it makes landfall, probably on the central Louisiana coast. The current forecast track has changed little over the past three days. Relatively speaking, this is good news for New Orleans. There will be miles of wetlands, suburbs, and the river (and its levees) interposed between the city and the center of the storm. Areas to the south and west of the city would bear the brunt of the storm surge. Most of this is sparsely-populate bayou country, but there is one substantial urban area, Houma-Thibodaux, population 32,000.

The Saffir-Simpson scale is somewhat misleading, especially where Louisiana is concerned, because it’s based on wind speed. What really matters in Louisiana is storm surge. A big storm pushes an incredible amount of water over the coastline’s flat, marshy topography. Channels and decaying marshes offer avenues for water to get further inland, where it can easily engulf levees and inhabited areas.

Gustav looks especially ominous for several reasons. The longer the hurricane remains at Category 4 and 5 before making landfall, the bigger its storm surge will be. This is what made Katrina so devastating – it was a large Category 4 and 5 storm for nearly two days. Wind speeds fell as it came ashore, but the huge wave it generated didn’t dissipate with them. Gustav is also coming in diagonally, which will increase the time it is pushing water inland.

My friend and colleague Mark Schleifstein has some reporting up on this today:

Hurricane Gustav will be at Category 4 strength with winds of 145 mph only 12 hours before it hits the central Louisiana coastline Monday afternoon, according to a 2 p.m. National Hurricane Center forecast.

On that track, a Louisiana State University coastal scientist says, storm surge could reach the top or overtop levees on the West Bank, could raise water to 8 feet — plus waves — along levees on the Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet, and combined with a water-swollen Tchefuncte River, could push surge into Madisonville on the Northshore.

Water also could rise as high as 8 feet in the Industrial Canal, he said.

In a nutshell: areas around New Orleans will get swamped. The city itself will see some high water, but not high enough to top the levees (of course, this didn’t help last time) but may avoid the worst.

Update: Mayor Nagin has ordered a mandatory evacuation of New Orleans starting Sunday morning. The 11 p.m. forecast has shifted the track slightly eastward, increasing the risk to New Orleans.

NOAA’s hurricane modeling projections show that Gustav has taken a slightly more favorable turn – favorable at least for New Orleans. This track takes it substantially west of the metro area, with a possible landfall in Morgan City. That’s way out in the marshes, with not much else around:

Obviously, you can’t predict a landfall five days in advance. So this is all speculative. But that doesn’t mean anyone should underestimate the grave danger posed by this storm. In Louisiana, they’re not; residents are gearing up for mass evacuations, sandbags are being placed along the Lake Pontchartrain levees, and the city plans to haul people with no transportation out by bus or train.

So, on the eve of the 3rd Katrina anniversary, some lessons have been learned. The problem is, the big lessons weren’t. New Orleans remains woefully unprotected. Should a major storm come in at the wrong spot, the city would be swamped, and all the progress of the past three years undone and then some. This article gives a good outline of some of the strengths and persistent weaknesses of the levee system. One big improvement: floodgates on the drainage canals connected to Lake Pontchartrain that, in essence, allowed the open sea an entree into residential neighborhoods in 2005. One big problem: the “funnel” where N.O. meets the eastern marshes remains, and a major storm surge barreling into the small space would put the Lower 9th Ward, St. Bernard Parish, and eastern N.O. back underwater, and possibly the core of the city as well.

All of this raises a good question for the nation’s politicians as they duke it out at their conventions this week and next: why are we still playing Hurricane Roulette in the Gulf with New Orleans?

This is not looking good for Louisiana:

A suite of computer models on which the Hurricane Center bases its forecast stubbornly move the storm towards landfall along a narrowing band of the northern Gulf of Mexico coastline between just east of Pensacola, Fla., to just west of Houston.

Several of those models bring Gustav ashore just east or west of New Orleans as a Category 4 hurricane after weakening from Category 5 strength.

Of course, computer models are all over the place:

The worst case scenario – a track taking Gustav just west of New Orleans – remains statistically unlikely. Gustav could stall, weaken suddenly, or veer off toward relatively unpopulated areas.

But the real question here is, what kind of a storm surge will Gustav generate, and will the New Orleans-area levee system be able to withstand it? The Corps of Engineers is still working on its big post-Katrina upgrade, which will ultimately give the metro area protection against a 100-year flood level. The problem is, a Category 4 storm will almost always generate a greater-than 100-year flood level. (Which is why the current upgrades are inadequate.) If Gustav comes ashore as a Category 4, on a worst-case track, it will overwhelm the levees. The only question is exactly where, and how deep, the flooding will be.

Kudos to John Barry for pushing what, until recently, seemed like a dead letter – a federal “8/29″ commission to investigate what went wrong with the New Orleans levee system during Hurricane Katrina:

The resolution approved by the Southeast Louisiana Flood Protection Authority-East was proposed by authority Secretary John Barry, also the author of “Rising Tide: The Great Mississippi Flood of 1927 and How It Changed America.”

An 8/29 commission was originally proposed in 2006 by Levees.org, a local group critical of the Army Corps of Engineers and its construction of the levees. The group gained support from Sen. Mary Landrieu for the proposal, but Landrieu has said her attempts have been blocked by republicans.

Barry’s resolution calls for the commission to look beyond the specific reasons levees and floodwalls failed during the 2005 hurricane and include a review of how hurricane and flood protection are designed all along the Mississippi River.

“I’m really asking that they take a comprehensive look at the entire Mississippi River system, the entire Mississippi valley, from New York state to Idaho,” Barry said. “They should look, for instance, at the dams on the upper Missouri River in detail, because they have a real impact on the amount of sediment that’s carried in the river, which has a real impact on the erosion of wetlands in Louisiana.”

This is exactly right: at issue is not merely how some bad designs crept into floodwalls (a question that, criminally, remains unanswered), but why the whole system failed, and what lessons we might glean from that to prevent it from happening again, in New Orleans and elsewhere. As Barry so brilliantly documented in “Rising Tide,” in the 1920s the Corps of Engineers and other institutions (Congress, state and local agencies) were incapable of responding either to actual changes in the landscape or to advances in the scientific understanding of river flooding – resulting in the terrible 1927 Mississippi River flood. The same was true of hurricane flooding in the 40 years before Katrina. Incredibly, it’s true today as well – for both kinds of floods, as we can see by what’s happening in the Midwest now. Only by looking at the whole system from stem to stern can we get our arms around these problems. Will it happen? With the Democrats in control of Congress and perhaps the presidency, maybe.

There’s a good piece in the Washington Post today by the redoubtable Joel Achenbach addressing this issue. Agriculture has altered the physical landscape of Iowa in ways that scientists and engineers don’t fully understand or appreciate, and that is compounding the current flooding disaster.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.