I have a piece up on the Guardian site with some post-Gustav reflections:
The fact is, due to feedback from human activities, nature has begun to change faster than US government institutions can keep up. There’s a healthy scientific debate over the potential role of global warming in hurricane activity. Some scientists believe a warming atmosphere will lead to more powerful storms. Others say the effects will be minimal. But most everyone agrees that hurricane activity in the Atlantic is in a dangerous, possibly decades-long upswing.
If it is indeed amplified by global warming, we’re going to see some storms unlike any in the past in the coming years. Meanwhile, the lure of living on the coast (and along riverbanks) has put many millions more people in the path of danger, along with their valuable properties, increasing the risk of huge, Katrina-scale losses that will test the insurance industry and the federal government’s budgetary limits.
In order to deal with this, we’re going to have to make some basic changes in how the government operates. Right now, it’s reactive – a major disaster happens (whether a natural catastrophe, or a crash in the financial system, or the food system, or … ) requiring some kind of federal intervention – not just a cleanup operation but some genuine reforms. Congress and the president do something (or not). But I’m guessing that global warming will accelerate the speed at which the environment is changing and quickly outpace all the systems we have in place to make sure people can go on living their lives. We’ll need a government that processes information faster, and acts more quickly.


