I’ve been an inconsistent viewer of 24 over its 7 seasons (there was that brief, ultimately disappointing “Heroes” phase) but I’m back now. The current season has been really good. Or rather, it’s been really … watchable. “Good” implies a certain level of artistic/dramatic consistency the show can never, ever reach due to its innate preposterousness. But it seems to work best when it acknowledges the very faint undercurrent of farce always present just beneath the noisy world-about-to end action. This is what worked so well in season 5, when the weaselly President Charles Logan and his wacky wife Martha managed to be crazy, unpredictable and kind of funny all at the same time. The same applies to the ever-present, socially-inept Chloe.
This season, the show has layered the earnest action and farce with something else – a straight-up advocacy of torture (at least in the “ticking time bomb” scenario, which is 100 percent of the show but in real life, exceedingly rare).
So last night the show went completely bonkers, featuring a) Jack Bauer torturing a guy – a traitorous aide to “Blaine Mayer,” the insufferably self-righteous senator who has been investigating Jack for torture – in the White House; followed immediately by b) a terrorist assault on the very same White House in which the president and Sen. Mayer are taken hostage, presumably to be rescued by Bauer.
Watching this, I was trying to figure out what the hell it meant, if anything. Obviously, Joel Surnow’s position is that torture is useful. But was the show saying the president should condone it? (She didn’t. Nor did that seem like a good option for her.) Or is it saying that only Jack Bauer – someone willing to cross any line to get the job done when necessary, then face the legal/moral consequences – should do it (implying those lines should remain in place)? That’s the impression you’re left with; Jack at one point urges good-guy Bill Buchanan to go start tasering the traitor again, and he won’t do it.
On the other hand, the show is reveling in its own transgressions. The torture-ee is a smarmy young asshole who obviously deserves it. So we’re rooting for it. And Jack’s doing it in the West Wing, maybe in Dick Cheney’s old office. It’s appalling. Sen. Mayer (a joke on writer Jane Mayer, author of The Dark Side), is a terrible, nattering caricature of torture opponents. Yet his preening senatorial pompousness really is spot-on, so it’s hilarious to watch him get a comeuppance. So: appalling, hilarious, provocative, farcical: a solid hour’s entertainment – if you don’t take it too seriously. But not a particularly good guide for those devising Obama administration’s interrogation policies.
March 4, 2009 at 3:37 pm
Yeah, this show has become a joke, a parody of itself. E.g., who knew it was so easy to infiltrate the White House using only scuba gear and a blowtorch? One moment you’re in the bowels of the building, the next, you’re sauntering down to the Oval Office with a cadre of commandos in tow. It’s no wonder why so many conservatives LOVE this show- it’s pure fantasy.
March 4, 2009 at 3:55 pm
I tried to watch it consistently a few seasons back but found its jittery, hanging-over-the-edge melodrama not merely ridiculous but sleep-inducing. Not to mention that the earlier endorsements of torture and government-sponsored murder were, quite simply, highly offensive. As to its current appeal,I beg to differ. It is not only unwatchable, it remains distasteful and repellent.
March 4, 2009 at 3:55 pm
i love the show, but it struck as odd that when bauer was torturing mayer’s aide, bauer didn’t think to check the aide’s cell phone for info….. in the previous episode the aide received a message on his phone saying that the attack (on the whitehouse) was going forward.
check the phone jack
March 4, 2009 at 4:14 pm
The show maybe uninentionally is proof of how torture doesn’t work as planned. Jack can’t even get a wimpy aide who is being electrocuted to tell him what he needs to know. The aide knows, as would most anybody in a ticking time bomb case, that they just have to hold out for a few more minutes or hours, maybe mislead them a little bit, and you’re left with an attack on the White House Jack was screaming that he would have got him to talk if it wasn’t for (insert your favorite), famous last words.
March 4, 2009 at 4:18 pm
I should find the torture offensive, but the show has reached a place of such high camp that I only find it kinda funny. And I’m with you, it’s entertaining as can be. I love how the woman FBI agent is all “you can’t torture no matter what” and through the ridiculous convolutions of the plot she’s threatening to kill some woman’s baby unless she gets info from her husband–an hour later! Most hilarious moment of the season so far has got to be Jack’s first appearance: We see the nefarious Senator Mayer accuse him of shredding the constitution and the Geneva convention and everything short of infanticide. Then cut to Jack, man alone, behind the desk as the soundtrack cues a lone trumpet. I won’t miss an episode.
March 4, 2009 at 4:39 pm
To quote my own blogpost “On ’24′” (http://aryngve.blogspot.com/2007/06/on-24.html):
24′s basic premise is to glorify torture as necessary to “protect democracy” and “protect the innocent.” If you truly believe that, you are not just morally corrupt but quite ignorant. No democratic nation was ever founded on torture. (But plenty of real-world dictatorships rely on torture as an instrument of oppression.)
March 4, 2009 at 4:40 pm
Okay, I’m willing to rethink my position. Whenever the proposed torturee is found in a room that’s ticking loudly and he’s holding a smoking gun in one hand and a “worst of the worst inc.” laminated photo id on a lanyard in the other and tauntingly whines, “I know something you don’t know”, I may be okay with treating him to a chunk of coral enema. Come on, Monday night, the Pope himself would have offered President Aunt Bea the Papal taser to use on Senator Mayer’s aide. I still don’t think it’s all that analogous to some chump keeping an eye on Bin Laden’s goat outside a Kabul 7/11.
March 4, 2009 at 5:07 pm
Agree that ’24′ can only be taken as mindless entertainment, not as even semi-serious commentary. Heck, Jack even tortured his own brother last year (who fed him false intel, by the way). The only way this show works is if they keep the pedal to the metal the whole way, so you gloss ever the Hey, wait a minute! moments. Like: Some 2-bit warlord has half the US government infiltrated? Apparently pretty easy to do on this show. They know there’s a imminent attack due on a high value target in DC, but the POTUS is just hanging around the Oval Office waiting? And what happened to all the military guys you saw throughout the White House earlier in the episode? They all got replaced by faceless targets in suits, apparently. That said, I can’t wait ’til next week.
March 4, 2009 at 5:13 pm
And, of course, the fact that the presidential “lockdown” doesn’t have a secure telephone. You’d think it might be a critical design feature, right?
March 4, 2009 at 5:19 pm
The president had a line in the episode I found intriguing. She said, “Torture used to be for forcing false confessions, now we are using it to get to the truth.”
Doen’t that strike you as completely ass backwards?
The line the Senator spewed at Bauer at the end of the episode was priceless. “Now what have you done?” as if speaking to a five year old who just knocked over his grandmother’s prize petunias.
March 4, 2009 at 6:04 pm
“24″ is new to me via HULU in the past few weeks. Watching seasons 1 and 7 simultaneously. Wow good suspense in every episode what with the improbable situation and Jack Bauer somehow able to partially resolve with a cliffhanging ending to be resolved next episode. I love it. The White House abduction is unbelievable but then again lots of drama… what ifs. I was actually thinking i hope Malia and Sasha are safe there! OH well… wondering how the season will evolve now that the real torturers are out of office….
March 4, 2009 at 7:03 pm
Surprised you didn’t mention the most over-the-top scene of them all – General Juma punching our female president in the face! That’s so wrong on so many levels – it was almost hilarious.
March 4, 2009 at 7:51 pm
24 is just pure campy entertainment. Nothing more. It’s a fun ride.
The really scary part is that the Bush Administration was basing its policy on the ideas of this TV show. Un-frickin-believable!
March 4, 2009 at 8:55 pm
One problem with your critique- Surnow left the show and has had nothing to do with this season creatively.
It’s a television show- if you like it (which I do for the acting and the suspense) watch it..if you don’t like it, turn the channel…that prescription works for right-wing political shows are well as left-wing shows.
March 5, 2009 at 12:13 am
“So: appalling, hilarious, provocative, farcical: a solid hour’s entertainment – if you don’t take it too seriously. But not a particularly good guide for those devising Obama administration’s interrogation policies.”
Ya think? It’s so blindingly stupid that it is campy fun. But I’d say it’s BLINDINGLY obvious that it has nothing whatsoever to do with real policy.
March 5, 2009 at 4:12 am
I love the show, I think it is the best tv show ever. The action is awesome. This years is the weakest yet, I think people who think this one is the best hasn’t really watched the previous ones, including the first year.
But anyone who takes it seriously in any way is out of their mind.
It is a fucking tv show for christ’s sake.
March 5, 2009 at 6:12 pm
I especially got a chuckle from the Chief of Staff debating immunity for the traitor with the President and say, “Now that coercive interrogation is off the table that’s all we’re left with.”
So it’s torture or amnesty folks!
March 6, 2009 at 4:40 am
If only torture was as entertaining in real life as it is in “24″!